Why Are 4K TVs Cheaper Than Monitors?

The definition of a phone, a watch, and a monitor has shifted as technology has become more integrated. As a result, many devices are now interchangeable. With more people utilizing televisions as monitors, you might be wondering why a 4K TV is less expensive than a 4K monitor.

4K TVs are less expensive than monitors because monitors must have more pixels per inch to be classified as 4K, whereas TVs are large enough to have 4K pixels without being prohibitively expensive to manufacture.

Furthermore, because monitors require low input lag, they are intrinsically more expensive to manufacture.

Based on your choices, the rest of this article will help you decide whether you can use a television as a computer screen and whether a 4K television is better than a 4K monitor.

The distinctions between monitors and televisions, such as lag time, pixels per inch, and demand, are discussed.

You’ll also discover what each of these distinctions means to you.

How Do Monitors Become More Expensive?

When comparing smart televisions and monitors, you’ll see that monitors are far more expensive than TVs for panels with the same pixel capacity.

This is due to three causes in particular.

1. Pixels per Inch

A 4K screen has a width of 3840 pixels and a height of 2160 pixels.

The name comes from the width of the screen, which is around 4000 pixels.

A 4K screen is referred to as extreme HD since it has a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is twice that of standard HD.

However, image quality is determined not only by the overall number of pixels but also by the number of pixels per inch.

At 4K, for example, a panel that is 3,840 inches wide would have one pixel every inch.

Despite being in 4K, this image is still blurry and requires a distance of several meters to see clearly.

To have a clear picture, stay away from broader panels, and the screens you are regularly close to must have greater pixels per inch to provide the same image quality.

To get more pixels per inch, screens need to have sophisticated panels, which is why certain smartphones are so pricey.

Because monitors are used at such close ranges, manufacturers must invest in costly sophisticated panels in order to produce 4K pixels, but TVs may be built wide enough to hold 4K pixels that can be seen from a distance.

2. Input Time Lag

Input lag occurs on computer monitors and television screens.

This is the time difference between the input and the image on the screen in milliseconds.

New inputs, such as different applications, browsers, and games, are frequently used to refresh computer screens.

Hundreds of inputs, including player angle adjustments, player movement, and other actions, are given in minutes, especially in games.

As a result, as compared to television, PC monitors have a reduced input lag time.

Monitor lag durations range from 15 to 22 milliseconds on average. On the other hand, TV screens have a lag time of up to 40 milliseconds.

This discrepancy forces monitor makers to pay more in production, but because blinking takes 250 milliseconds.

The difference is barely perceptible when watching TV episodes or movies.

How Come the Lag Doesn’t Show Up in Movies?

When you read that TVs have a longer input delay than computer monitors, you might be perplexed as to why there is no discernible delay when watching a movie or television show on your TV.

This is due to the fact that every second has the same delay.

As a result, the show is not disrupted. It simply begins 40 milliseconds after you press play.

3. Requirement

The iPhone project cost about $175 million and delivered less than 10 iPhones (prototypes) for Apple.

Making an iPhone nowadays can cost up to $1,500. Economies of scale account for the discrepancy.

When you’re producing a large enough quantity of something, you might invest in simplifying the process.

The high demand principle, which lowers the per-unit cost of production, can be seen everywhere from iPhones to McDonald’s.

This takes us to 4K monitors, which are far less popular than 4K TV screens.

While 4K TVs are chosen by those who enjoy watching high-definition movies and television shows, 4K monitors are almost solely sought after by gamers.

Monitor producers must pay a higher per-unit cost to build their monitors because of the smaller market.

Which Is Better: A 4K TV or a 4K Monitor?

You might be wondering if a 4K TV is better for you and your budget than a monitor because many people use flat-screen TVs as computer monitors.

4K TV is more cost-effective and provides the same pixel amount for watching movies and TV shows as 4K displays.

4K monitors, on the other hand, feature a clearer image that can be seen from closer to the screen.

Who should consider purchasing a 4K monitor? If you’re a competitive gamer, you might want to reduce the input lag as much as possible.

It’s not a good idea to utilize your TV as a computer screen in this situation.

Who should invest in a 4K television?

Anyone who wishes to see 4K super HD content on YouTube or from other sources should acquire a 4K TV rather than a 4K monitor.

Because you don’t need more pixels per inch while viewing from a distance, yet monitors can cost more than twice as much as a 4K television, this is the case.

Final Thoughts-

While TV panels and monitors have lately become interchangeable, monitors are still more expensive to manufacture.

This is due to the fact that they must respond to commands continuously and have a longer lag time.

They also need to cram more pixels per inch into a smaller screen because users are sitting closer to it.

For an audience sitting at a distance, TV manufacturers can spend less money to achieve the same image result.

You don’t need the screen to receive commands from you continuously while watching a movie, sports event, or TV show, so you’re better off buying a 4K TV rather than splurging for a 4K monitor.


3 thoughts on “Why Are 4K TVs Cheaper Than Monitors?”

Leave a Comment