Monitor vs TV Which for Console Gaming

The screen you’re playing on is the most important part of any gaming setup, aside from your console or PC. But, in 2021, which is better: a gaming monitor’s competitive edge or the size and bombast of a gaming TV?

When gaming monitors had a clear advantage in speed, accuracy, and response time, the question of which is better—gaming monitor vs. TV—was a lot easier to answer, but in recent years, many gaming TVs have adopted features that have helped bring them in line.

Even so, there are some key distinctions between a gaming monitor and television that are worth noting, especially if you’re a serious gamer who spends a lot of time staring at your display.

While gaming TVs have begun to adopt higher refresh rates, gaming monitors have pushed their refresh rates even higher, reaching 360Hz.

In competitive gaming, this makes them difficult to beat, but if you want the best image possible, a 4K gaming TV with an OLED panel is unrivaled.

There are some excellent 40-inch-plus monitors on the market that deliver stunning visuals, but they fall short of the best TVs.

Few gaming monitors support the new HDMI 2.1 interface technology, which makes gaming TVs a more viable option for fully exploiting the PS5 and Xbox Series X’s capabilities.

Of course, for PC gamers who prefer to use a keyboard and mouse as their primary tools—or for those who own the smaller Xbox Series S—an excellent 144Hz monitor is still a great choice.

Despite these differences, gaming monitors and gaming televisions have begun to close the gap, and both can deliver an excellent gaming experience.

You can’t go wrong with either, but each type of screen has its own set of advantages and depending on the type of gamer you are, one may just edge out the other.

In this article, we’ll address all of the major concerns about monitors and televisions when it comes to gaming.

But first, let’s go over some of the more common terms you’ll hear when shopping for a gaming monitor.

If you’re not familiar with the fancy jargon, read the section below to get acquainted with the terms you’ll need to know.

VIDEO: Gaming Monitor vs. TV in 2021! Which one should you pick?

If you’re new to all of this and have never pondered whether a TV or monitor is better for gaming, we’ve compiled a glossary of words below.

1. Resolution – The number of pixels that can be displayed on a screen. Full HD (1080p) is the most popular resolution, 1440p is Quad HD (high-end monitors), and 2160p is 4K/Ultra HD (highest-end, used by both TVs and monitors).

2. Refresh Rate – The number of times per second that an image on a screen is refreshed.

In TVs, 60Hz is almost universal, yet in monitors, it is considered entry-level.

A faster refresh rate on a display gives a considerably smoother experience, free of unpleasant screen abnormalities like screen tears.

TVs, on the other hand, has a reputation for having low native (or actual) refresh rates.

That is no longer the case since several contemporary choices offer superior speed and responsiveness.

3. Response Time – The time it takes a single pixel to transition from one color to the next. The smaller the number, the better.

4. Input Lag – This is a direct assessment of how long it takes for your actions to be registered onscreen and is related to the above.

The smaller the number, the better. HDR stands for High Dynamic Range.

For richer color reproduction and more varying degrees of darkness and brightness, new 4K displays adopt the HDR10 standard.

What Is The Difference Between A TV And A Monitor For Gaming?

On the surface, TVs and gaming monitors have a lot in common, but the specifications are what separate them.

When compared to current TVs, gaming monitors will typically have substantially greater refresh rates and image density.

Furthermore, they usually have reduced input lag and a wider range of stand options.

Color reproduction and maximum screen resolution used to be issued with monitors; but, with advancements in panel technology over the last 3-5 years, this is no longer the case.

4K displays with very accurate color reproduction aren’t as uncommon as they previously were, which is wonderful news for multimedia creators and color-conscious productivity users.

TVs are often larger and more concerned with aspects like color reproduction and viewing pleasure than with pixel density or quickness.

Thanks to display technologies targeted at the typical living room setting, they also tend to be considerably better for viewing at wide angles.

Because of the introduction of OLED technology, several gaming-specific TVs now have exceptionally low input latency and pixel response times.

Which reduces the amount of motion blur and ghosting that can occur.

Furthermore, with refresh rates hitting dizzying highs of 120hz, some TVs are now able to match the responsiveness of gaming monitors.

High-definition (HDR) and image quality-

Modern TVs normally have a resolution of 1080p or 4K, with 8K being added recently.

Monitors, on the other hand, are more adaptable, supporting 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions.

In general, TVs place a greater emphasis on the raw viewing experience and visual quality.

Gaming monitors, on the other hand, strive to balance specs as much as possible, often compromising on one aspect for cost considerations.

However, with the recent inflow of IPS panels, sacrificing color accuracy for responsiveness is becoming increasingly rare.

When HDR is taken into account, there is virtually no competition.

While HDR (high dynamic range) has gained a lot of traction in the gaming monitor world, TVs still have a lot more of it.

Furthermore, if you’re playing on a PC, most of your material doesn’t support HDR yet, although the PS4 Pro, Xbox One S, and Xbox One X do.

It’s no wonder that so many gamers are switching from TV to monitor, thanks to increased HDR compatibility and IPS panels that provide better color reproduction and viewing angles.

Input Lag is a term that refers to the time it takes for-

Many gamers may have observed that their games are nearly unplayable without enabling a “Game Mode” on their TVs when they transition from CRT displays to huge flatscreen HDTVs.

This is because huge HDTVs have begun to use specialist graphics processing gear to handle higher-resolution inputs, resulting in cleaner visuals and smoother movement.

CRTs, on the other hand, did not have this issue and are still preferred by some gamers (looking at you, Melee players) who seek to reduce input lag.

Monitors have never needed to use a Game Mode to achieve acceptable input latency, and monitors do substantially better in this category overall.

Taking into account the existence of 144hz and 240hz monitors, monitors are now even better at decreasing input lag than any similar TV.

Most monitors have a response time of 1 to 5 milliseconds (although some cheaper, bigger, or IPS displays are slower), but TVs have a response time of 5 milliseconds and go up to 20 milliseconds.

It’s less well-publicized, and built-in Game Modes can aid to some extent, but the numbers show that televisions are slower.

Sync Technologies And High Refresh Rates-

Let’s start with the -Sync technology. G-Sync and FreeSync, to be exact.

These two technologies, from Nvidia and AMD, aim to eliminate screen tearing by dynamically adjusting refresh rate to frame rate, resulting in increased perceived smoothness.

Both of these technologies are extensively supported in the top end of gaming monitors and achieve essentially the same thing.

Preventing screen tearing on televisions is more difficult. Only a few very high-end TVs support G-Sync and FreeSync.

On a TV, you’ll pay a lot more than you would on a monitor to acquire these functions.

Both display types can have high refresh rates, as we noted in the “terms” section, but they manage them differently.

When you buy a 120Hz monitor, it will display that refresh rate natively as well as be able to display extra frames produced by your PC when gaming.

You might get a soap opera effect if you buy a 120Hz TV, and you’re unlikely to find 120Hz improvements in gaming.

This is because most high-refresh-rate TVs employ a technique known as “interpolation,” which aims to reduce ghosting and make motion appear smoother.

This can cause what’s known as the “soap opera effect,” in which a TV show or movie appears too smooth to be genuine, though this isn’t an issue with gaming.

However, there are high-end TVs that can support these higher refresh rates and are designed specifically for gaming. Expect to spend more money on it.


While game televisions are available, getting one with the features you want can be costly.

As a result, televisions get larger, more sophisticated, and more expensive to manufacture.

High-end solutions exist for both display technologies, but even low-to-midrange monitors deliver less latency and input lag than TVs at comparable budgets.

When it comes to pure gaming value, monitors are unquestionably the best option.


Let’s talk about convenience now. We’ll look at it from two perspectives: viewing distance and viewing angles.

1. Visual Distinction

The larger size of a TV makes gaming from your couch or bed much more feasible, and this benefit grows with the size of your display.

Because of the smaller size of monitors, you must be much closer to your display.

Unless you have hundreds of dollars to spend on a high-end gaming chair, the truth is that sitting at a desk isn’t quite as pleasant as slouching on a couch or lying in bed.

Of course, sitting at a desk isn’t an issue for PC gamers, and the benefits of responsiveness far outweigh this disadvantage.

2. Viewing Positions

TVs have excellent viewing angles, allowing you to sit in your living room in a variety of positions without the colors changing.

While IPS monitors have significantly better viewing angles than TN monitors, they are more expensive and not worth it for serious gamers.

Wide viewing angles and large sizes are advantages of televisions.

While TVs may have better viewing angles than monitors, keep in mind that you will most likely be seated in front of your monitor when gaming, rendering a great viewing angle worthless in most situations.

TV vs. Monitor For Gaming: Which Is Better?

What is the current door score? We’ll do some fast summary, as well as our final verdict and a few recommendations, in this section.

1. Quality of the image

Furthermore, HDR TVs offer superior viewing experiences at lower prices, as well as better HDR support than monitors.

As a result, we chose TVs for this category, but if you’re willing to pay more on your monitor, you can get greater image quality.

2. Lag in the Input

Monitors are unquestionably the best in this category. Even high-end gaming televisions with fast response times and high refresh rates are more expensive.

Even IPS panel gaming monitors now have extremely little input lag, making the display a clear winner.

3. Sync Technologies And High Refresh Rates

A gaming monitor is an obvious choice if you want to play with a high refresh rate and truly employ framerates exceeding 60.

Most TVs with high refresh rates only use them for interpolation, not for raw visual performance, and the few that do have input latency that is greater than monitors.

Both TVs and monitors support variable refresh rate technologies, but the latter is far cheaper.

FreeSync and G-Sync displays are still more expensive than displays that don’t support those features, so if you’re going to buy one, make sure you use it.

4. Costing

If you’re only seeking a good gaming experience at a reasonable budget, a gaming monitor will be much easier to obtain than a TV.

Especially if you’re a competitive player. When it comes to gaming monitors vs. TVs, it’s clear that monitors dominate.

However, if you like to watch rather than participate, you could argue that a TV is a way to go.

Gaming monitors, on the other hand, are the clear winner, thanks to the latest models’ IPS panels, HDR, and wide viewing angles.

5. Convenience

Last but not least, there’s comfort, which TVs overwhelmingly outperform because of their longer viewing distances and greater viewing angles.

There’s a reason why TVs are so popular for couch gaming and local multiplayer; they simply provide a superior experience.

Yes, slouching on the sofa while gaming is the ultimate in comfort, but with high-end gaming monitors with IPS panels and the possibility to buy ultrawide 4K gaming monitors, there is something for everyone.


1. Is it better to game on a monitor or television?

Yes, monitors are considerably superior to televisions for gaming. This is because they respond faster than television.

When watching videos, TV shows, or movies, faster response times are less important, but they are significant when gaming.

2. Does a gaming monitor make a difference?

If a game can run at 100 frames per second, playing it on a display with that many refreshes per second may provide a noticeable benefit.

Higher refresh rate screens, on the other hand, will make no impact if you’re watching a film at the conventional 24 frames per second.

3. What are the advantages of tiny monitors for professional gamers?

It’s big enough to see details while still being small enough to fit into small locations like desks and tables.

Furthermore, for a panel of this size, 144Hz and 240Hz refresh rates, as well as a rapid response time, are fairly priced.

While larger TVs or monitors will be used for home rigs, most competitive gaming can be done with a 24-inch display.

4. Why is a TV less expensive than a monitor?

Consumers are sometimes unaware of the manufacturing costs.

As a result, manufacturers have the freedom to set prices as high as the market will bear.

Furthermore, because TVs are acquired in larger quantities than monitors, selling TVs at a profit is easier than selling monitors.

5. Is it worthwhile to invest in gaming monitors?

Is it profitable to invest in a screen with a high refresh rate?

Indeed, having the best gaming laptop or PC with the most powerful components is useless unless you have a monitor with a high enough refresh rate to display such high frame rates.

So, as a reward, buy one for yourself!


Monitors appear to be the better choice for pure gaming performance and latency, as well as winning more of our categories, thus there is no contest.

Having said that, there will be times when you’ll want to watch TV instead.

A TV and a couch, for example, offer far more than a desk and monitor configuration while playing casual single-player games.

Furthermore, if you’re playing on an Xbox One S or PS5, a TV with HDR may be a better choice, while there are plenty of terrific monitors for console gaming.

If you aren’t serious about playing competitively and don’t have the hardware to support high refresh rate displays, sitting back, relaxing, and playing a game on your widescreen TV will be preferable to hunching over your desk and frantically punching keys and buttons.

Ultimately, gaming, particularly PC gaming, is about choice.

The winner here is mostly determined by your expectations for your game experience.

Get a gaming monitor if you’re a competitive player who wants to climb the leaderboards, participate in esports, and push yourself as far as you can.

However, for sociable gamers, a television may provide a superior gaming experience.


4 thoughts on “Monitor vs TV Which for Console Gaming”

Leave a Comment